Clay vs Orbix Studio: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Clay (4.0/5) edges ahead of Orbix Studio (3.6/5) overall. Clay is the better choice for b2B SaaS, AI, and fintech companies wanting a boutique studio with a big-tech-caliber client list.. Orbix Studio is the stronger option for seed-to-Series-B B2B SaaS, fintech, and healthtech startups wanting a young, founder-close team.. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Clay vs Orbix Studio: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Clay | Orbix Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2015 | 2023 |
| HQ | San Francisco, CA, USA | Queens, NY, USA |
| Team size | Boutique-to-mid (unconfirmed; not published by the company) | 10–30 |
| Rating | 4.0 / 5 | 3.6 / 5 |
| Best for | B2B SaaS, AI, and fintech companies wanting a boutique studio with a big-tech-caliber client list. | Seed-to-Series-B B2B SaaS, fintech, and healthtech startups wanting a young, founder-close team. |
| Pricing model | Fixed project | Fixed project |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, Framer, Webflow | Figma, React, Swift |
| Industries served | SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech, Consumer products | SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech, Healthcare |
Clay vs Orbix Studio: overview
Clay
Clay (clay.global), based in San Francisco with substantial NYC client history, doesn't publish a founding year — tagged here as unconfirmed — and its team size is likewise not independently verifiable, best treated as boutique-to-mid-size. Coinbase, Uber, SendGrid, MoneyLion, Meta, Google, Slack, Snapchat, Amazon, Toyota, and Samsung round out a client list reflecting deep B2B, SaaS, AI, and fintech experience. Note: this is the design studio at clay.global, distinct from the unrelated AI sales-data company also named Clay (clay.com).
Orbix Studio
Orbix Studio launched in 2023, making it notably the youngest studio in this entire list — a useful 'emerging' contrast point, but one with a genuinely limited track record relative to studios with a decade or more of history. Based in Queens, NY, the studio reports 10–30 employees depending on source, focused on B2B SaaS, fintech, and healthtech product design paired with front-end development, aimed specifically at funded startups from seed through Series B.
Services and capabilities: Clay vs Orbix Studio
| Capability | Clay | Orbix Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✓ | ✓ |
| Branding | ✓ | ✗ |
| Web development | ✗ | ✓ |
| Mobile development | ✗ | ✓ |
| Design systems | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Clay vs Orbix Studio
| Framework / platform | Clay | Orbix Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | ✓ | N/A |
| React | N/A | ✓ |
| Framer | ✓ | N/A |
| Adobe Creative Suite | ✓ | N/A |
| Design systems/Storybook | N/A | N/A |
| After Effects | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Clay vs Orbix Studio
| Criterion | Clay | Orbix Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Retainer | Fixed project |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Clay vs Orbix Studio
| Dimension | Clay | Orbix Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech, Consumer products | SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech, Healthcare |
| Best use cases | AI or fintech product design for a Series A-C startup, Consumer app design for a high-growth B2B SaaS brand | Seed-stage B2B SaaS MVP design and front-end build, Fintech product design for a Series A-B startup |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Clay vs Orbix Studio: pros and cons
| Clay | |
|---|---|
| + | Client list (Coinbase, Uber, Meta, Google, Slack, Snapchat, Amazon) is exceptional for a boutique-to-mid-size studio |
| + | Deep, specific track record across B2B, SaaS, AI, and fintech product design |
| + | San Francisco base with strong NYC client relationships |
| + | Combines UX design, branding, and web/product design under one roof |
| - | Founding year is not independently confirmed outside the company's own materials |
| - | Team size is neither published nor independently verifiable, complicating capacity planning for large programs |
| - | Easily confused with the unrelated AI company Clay (clay.com) — confirm you're researching clay.global |
| Orbix Studio | |
|---|---|
| + | Built specifically for funded startups at the seed-through-Series-B stage, a precise positioning few others in this list share |
| + | Small team size (10–30) means direct founder-to-founder access rather than layered account management |
| + | Combines product design with front-end development, reducing hand-off risk for early-stage teams |
| + | Covers three complex, high-value verticals (B2B SaaS, fintech, healthtech) despite its youth |
| - | Founded in 2023 — by a wide margin the thinnest public track record of any studio in this list |
| - | 10–30 person team caps capacity for large or multi-workstream programs |
| - | Minimum engagement is not published, so budget planning requires a direct conversation |
Who should choose Clay?
Clay is the right choice for b2B SaaS, AI, and fintech companies wanting a boutique studio with a big-tech-caliber client list..
A client list (Coinbase, Uber, Meta, Google, Slack) unusually strong relative to its unconfirmed, boutique-scale headcount. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech, Consumer products.
Who should choose Orbix Studio?
Orbix Studio is the right choice for seed-to-Series-B B2B SaaS, fintech, and healthtech startups wanting a young, founder-close team..
The newest studio in this list, built specifically around the seed-to-Series-B funded startup stage. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech, Healthcare.
Decision matrix: Clay vs Orbix Studio
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Clay |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Check each company's engagement model |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Clay (Not published) vs Orbix Studio (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Clay |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Clay vs Orbix Studio
| Use case | Clay fit | Orbix Studio fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| AI or fintech product design for a Series A-C startup | Strong | Limited | Clay |
| Consumer app design for a high-growth B2B SaaS brand | Strong | Limited | Clay |
| Seed-stage B2B SaaS MVP design and front-end build | Limited | Strong | Orbix Studio |
| Fintech product design for a Series A-B startup | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Clay vs Orbix Studio
Clay (4.0/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. A client list (Coinbase, Uber, Meta, Google, Slack) unusually strong relative to its unconfirmed, boutique-scale headcount. It is best for b2B SaaS, AI, and fintech companies wanting a boutique studio with a big-tech-caliber client list..
Orbix Studio (3.6/5) is the better choice when seed-to-Series-B B2B SaaS, fintech, and healthtech startups wanting a young, founder-close team.. If your situation matches those criteria, Orbix Studio is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Clay vs Orbix Studio FAQ
Is Clay better than Orbix Studio?
Clay (4.0/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Clay is better for b2B SaaS, AI, and fintech companies wanting a boutique studio with a big-tech-caliber client list.. Orbix Studio is better for seed-to-Series-B B2B SaaS, fintech, and healthtech startups wanting a young, founder-close team..
How do Clay and Orbix Studio differ in pricing?
Clay uses fixed project pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Orbix Studio uses fixed project pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Clay or Orbix Studio?
Orbix Studio is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each studio before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Clay and Orbix Studio?
Clay's primary differentiator is: a client list (coinbase, uber, meta, google, slack) unusually strong relative to its unconfirmed, boutique-scale headcount. Orbix Studio's primary differentiator is: the newest studio in this list, built specifically around the seed-to-series-b funded startup stage. They also differ in team size (Boutique-to-mid (unconfirmed; not published by the company) vs 10–30), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech vs SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech).
Verify all details directly with each studio before making a decision.