Excited vs UXDA: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Excited (4.6/5) edges ahead of UXDA (4.2/5) overall. Excited is the better choice for saaS and fintech product teams wanting a Clutch Top-5 specialist without enterprise-agency rates.. UXDA is the stronger option for banks and fintech companies wanting a studio exclusively focused on financial-services UX.. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Excited vs UXDA: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Excited | UXDA |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2018 | 2015 |
| HQ | Lviv, Ukraine | Riga, Latvia |
| Team size | 100+ | 25+ |
| Rating | 4.6 / 5 | 4.2 / 5 |
| Best for | SaaS and fintech product teams wanting a Clutch Top-5 specialist without enterprise-agency rates. | Banks and fintech companies wanting a studio exclusively focused on financial-services UX. |
| Pricing model | Fixed project, dedicated team | Fixed project, retainer |
| Min. engagement | $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable) | $30K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, Framer, After Effects | Figma, Sketch, Design systems/Storybook |
| Industries served | SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech | Financial services / fintech |
Excited vs UXDA: overview
Excited
Excited has grown from a 2018 start in Lviv, Ukraine to 100+ designers today, with Clutch consistently ranking it among the Top 5 UX studios globally — roughly 70% of its reviewers cite quality and creativity by name. Its work covers UX/UI, product design, branding, and motion design, purpose-built for SaaS and fintech, with delivery across 20+ countries and a self-reported reach of 15M+ product users (per company; independently unverifiable exact reach figure).
UXDA
Alex Kreger and co-founder Linda launched UXDA (Financial UX Design) in 2015 out of Riga, Latvia, where a 25+ multidisciplinary team has since defined or governed 150+ banking and fintech digital platforms across 39 countries. That exclusively financial-services focus makes it the clearest fintech specialist in this list — no other studio here works exclusively in one vertical.
Services and capabilities: Excited vs UXDA
| Capability | Excited | UXDA |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✓ | ✓ |
| Branding | ✓ | ✓ |
| Web development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Mobile development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Design systems | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Excited vs UXDA
| Framework / platform | Excited | UXDA |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | N/A | N/A |
| React | N/A | N/A |
| Framer | ✓ | N/A |
| Adobe Creative Suite | ✓ | N/A |
| Design systems/Storybook | N/A | ✓ |
| After Effects | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Excited vs UXDA
| Criterion | Excited | UXDA |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable) | $30K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Dedicated team | Fixed project, Retainer |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Accessible | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: Excited vs UXDA
| Dimension | Excited | UXDA |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech | Financial services / fintech |
| Best use cases | SaaS product redesign for a growth-stage company, Fintech UX/UI overhaul with motion design polish | Bank digital platform redesign, Fintech app UX for a regulated market |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Excited vs UXDA: pros and cons
| Excited | |
|---|---|
| + | Repeated Top 5 UX studio ranking worldwide by Clutch, not a one-off placement |
| + | Roughly 70% of Clutch reviewers specifically cite quality/creativity, a strong qualitative signal |
| + | Purpose-built around SaaS and fintech, giving real vertical depth |
| + | Delivery experience across 20+ countries demonstrates broad operational reach |
| - | The 15M+ user reach figure is self-reported and independently unverifiable |
| - | Ukraine-based team carries the same regional-continuity considerations as other Ukraine-rooted studios |
| - | SaaS/fintech specialization means less fit outside those two verticals |
| UXDA | |
|---|---|
| + | Exclusive financial-services focus gives it domain expertise generalist studios simply can't match |
| + | 150+ banking and fintech platforms shaped across 39 countries over a decade |
| + | Small, senior 25+ team keeps client relationships direct rather than layered through account management |
| + | A decade of continuous, single-vertical operation compounds domain knowledge over time |
| - | The exclusive fintech focus is a real limitation for any client outside financial services |
| - | $30K minimum engagement (per company website; independently unverifiable) runs higher than most 25-person boutiques |
| - | Small team size (25+) caps capacity for very large, multi-workstream programs |
Who should choose Excited?
Excited is the right choice for saaS and fintech product teams wanting a Clutch Top-5 specialist without enterprise-agency rates..
A repeat Clutch Top-5 global UX ranking, with roughly 70% of reviews specifically citing quality and creativity. Minimum engagement starts at $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech.
Who should choose UXDA?
UXDA is the right choice for banks and fintech companies wanting a studio exclusively focused on financial-services UX..
The only studio in this list exclusively focused on financial services UX, with 150+ banking and fintech platforms shaped across 39 countries. Minimum engagement starts at $30K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in Financial services / fintech.
Decision matrix: Excited vs UXDA
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Excited |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Excited |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Excited |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Excited |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Excited vs UXDA
| Use case | Excited fit | UXDA fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| SaaS product redesign for a growth-stage company | Strong | Limited | Excited |
| Fintech UX/UI overhaul with motion design polish | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Bank digital platform redesign | Limited | Strong | UXDA |
| Fintech app UX for a regulated market | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Excited vs UXDA
Excited (4.6/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. A repeat Clutch Top-5 global UX ranking, with roughly 70% of reviews specifically citing quality and creativity. It is best for saaS and fintech product teams wanting a Clutch Top-5 specialist without enterprise-agency rates..
UXDA (4.2/5) is the better choice when banks and fintech companies wanting a studio exclusively focused on financial-services UX.. If your situation matches those criteria, UXDA is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Excited vs UXDA FAQ
Is Excited better than UXDA?
Excited (4.6/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Excited is better for saaS and fintech product teams wanting a Clutch Top-5 specialist without enterprise-agency rates.. UXDA is better for banks and fintech companies wanting a studio exclusively focused on financial-services UX..
How do Excited and UXDA differ in pricing?
Excited uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable). UXDA uses fixed project, retainer pricing with a minimum engagement of $30K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Excited or UXDA?
Excited is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each studio before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Excited and UXDA?
Excited's primary differentiator is: a repeat clutch top-5 global ux ranking, with roughly 70% of reviews specifically citing quality and creativity. UXDA's primary differentiator is: the only studio in this list exclusively focused on financial services ux, with 150+ banking and fintech platforms shaped across 39 countries. They also differ in team size (100+ vs 25+), minimum engagement ($20K (per company website; independently unverifiable) vs $30K (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech vs Financial services / fintech).
Verify all details directly with each studio before making a decision.