Phenomenon Studio vs Spaceberry Studio: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Phenomenon Studio (4.9/5) edges ahead of Spaceberry Studio (3.7/5) overall. Phenomenon Studio is the better choice for direct access to senior people, no account layers. Spaceberry Studio is the stronger option for budget-conscious SaaS/AI teams, low-commitment subscription. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Phenomenon Studio vs Spaceberry Studio: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Phenomenon Studio | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2019 | 2016 |
| HQ | Europe (entities in the USA, Estonia, and Switzerland) | Ukraine (also London, UK) |
| Team size | 70+ | 12–50 |
| Rating | 4.9 / 5 | 3.7 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Structured as an actual studio — senior specialists working directly with clients, no account-management layer — rather than a large agency that happens to use the word 'studio' | One of the most accessible entry points in this list via a subscription model rather than a large upfront fixed-price contract |
| Pricing model | Project-based, full-cycle engagements (fixed scope or retainer — not published; contact for quote) | Monthly subscription (dedicated designer) |
| Min. engagement | Not published | $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, Webflow, React | Figma, Framer, Webflow |
| Industries served | SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech, Healthcare, EdTech | SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products |
Phenomenon Studio vs Spaceberry Studio: overview
Phenomenon Studio
Plenty of names on this list call themselves a "studio" while running more like a large agency, with account managers sitting between the client and the people actually doing the work. Phenomenon Studio, founded in 2019, is structured the other way: 70+ senior specialists, based in Europe with legal entities in the USA, Estonia, and Switzerland, work directly with clients across SaaS, fintech, healthcare, and EdTech, carrying each engagement from strategy through design, development, and post-launch support without handing it to a separate team partway through. That structure has produced 120+ shipped products for clients that have collectively raised $500M+, backed by a 5.0 Clutch rating, HIPAA compliance monitored by Compliancy Group, and Nielsen Norman Group UX certification.
Spaceberry Studio
Spaceberry Studio began in 2016 as "MainCode Agency," rebranding to Spaceberry in 2020 — 2016 is used as the founding year here since it's the same continuous team and entity. Based in Ukraine with an additional London office, the studio runs 12–50 employees depending on source, selling subscription-style UI/UX design for SaaS, AI, and mobile apps rather than quoting fixed-price projects — one of two subscription models in this list alongside Eleken.
Services and capabilities: Phenomenon Studio vs Spaceberry Studio
| Capability | Phenomenon Studio | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✓ | ✗ |
| Branding | ✓ | ✗ |
| Web development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Mobile development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Design systems | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Phenomenon Studio vs Spaceberry Studio
| Framework / platform | Phenomenon Studio | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | ✓ | ✓ |
| React | ✓ | N/A |
| Framer | ✓ | ✓ |
| Adobe Creative Suite | N/A | N/A |
| Design systems/Storybook | N/A | N/A |
| After Effects | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Phenomenon Studio vs Spaceberry Studio
| Criterion | Phenomenon Studio | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Retainer, Dedicated team | Subscription |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: Phenomenon Studio vs Spaceberry Studio
| Dimension | Phenomenon Studio | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech, Healthcare | SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products |
| Best use cases | A company wanting direct access to senior designers, not an account-management layer, A SaaS platform needing one team from strategy through launch | Ongoing SaaS product design on a monthly subscription, AI product UI/UX design for a lean startup team |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Subscription |
Phenomenon Studio vs Spaceberry Studio: pros and cons
| Phenomenon Studio | |
|---|---|
| + | Genuine studio structure: senior specialists work directly with clients, without an account-management layer in between |
| + | One team spans strategy through post-launch support, avoiding the hand-off risk of switching teams mid-project |
| + | 5.0 Clutch rating with Top 1000 Company 2025 and Top Design Company USA 2026 recognition |
| + | HIPAA compliance independently verified and monitored by Compliancy Group |
| + | Nielsen Norman Group UX Certification and four-tier Webflow Experts partner status |
| + | 120+ shipped products behind a combined $500M+ in client fundraising |
| - | The discovery-first process front-loads time before visible design work begins |
| - | No product or growth marketing services — a separate studio is needed for post-launch growth work |
| - | No published rate card; pricing requires a discovery call |
| Spaceberry Studio | |
|---|---|
| + | Subscription pricing (from ~$4.5K/month, per company website; independently unverifiable) is one of the lowest barriers to entry here |
| + | Focused specifically on SaaS, AI, and mobile apps rather than spreading thin across many verticals |
| + | London, UK location adds geographic diversification alongside its Ukraine base |
| + | Continuous operation since 2016, spanning its 2020 rebrand from MainCode Agency |
| - | Smallest reported team-size band (12–50) among the boutiques in this list, limiting capacity for large programs |
| - | Rebranded from MainCode Agency in 2020, so some pre-2020 case studies may appear under the earlier name |
| - | Subscription-only model may not suit clients preferring a single fixed-price contract with a defined end date |
Who should choose Phenomenon Studio?
A typical fit: a company wanting direct access to senior designers, not an account-management layer.
Structured as an actual studio — senior specialists working directly with clients, no account-management layer — rather than a large agency that happens to use the word 'studio'. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech, Healthcare, EdTech.
Who should choose Spaceberry Studio?
A typical fit: ongoing SaaS product design on a monthly subscription.
One of the most accessible entry points in this list via a subscription model rather than a large upfront fixed-price contract. Minimum engagement starts at $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products.
Decision matrix: Phenomenon Studio vs Spaceberry Studio
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Phenomenon Studio |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Phenomenon Studio |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Phenomenon Studio (Not published) vs Spaceberry Studio ($4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable)) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Phenomenon Studio |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Phenomenon Studio vs Spaceberry Studio
| Use case | Phenomenon Studio fit | Spaceberry Studio fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A company wanting direct access to senior designers, not an account-management layer | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A SaaS platform needing one team from strategy through launch | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Ongoing SaaS product design on a monthly subscription | Limited | Strong | Spaceberry Studio |
| AI product UI/UX design for a lean startup team | Limited | Strong | Spaceberry Studio |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Phenomenon Studio vs Spaceberry Studio
Phenomenon Studio (4.9/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. Structured as an actual studio — senior specialists working directly with clients, no account-management layer — rather than a large agency that happens to use the word 'studio'.
Spaceberry Studio (3.7/5) is worth a look if you need AI product UI/UX design for a lean startup team. If your situation matches that, Spaceberry Studio is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Phenomenon Studio vs Spaceberry Studio FAQ
Is Phenomenon Studio better than Spaceberry Studio?
Phenomenon Studio (4.9/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Phenomenon Studio's strongest advantage: genuine studio structure: senior specialists work directly with clients, without an account-management layer in between. Spaceberry Studio's strongest advantage: subscription pricing (from ~$4.5K/month, per company website; independently unverifiable) is one of the lowest barriers to entry here.
How do Phenomenon Studio and Spaceberry Studio differ in pricing?
Phenomenon Studio uses project-based, full-cycle engagements (fixed scope or retainer — not published; contact for quote) pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Spaceberry Studio uses monthly subscription (dedicated designer) pricing with a minimum engagement of $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Phenomenon Studio or Spaceberry Studio?
Spaceberry Studio is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each studio before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Phenomenon Studio and Spaceberry Studio?
Phenomenon Studio's primary differentiator is: structured as an actual studio — senior specialists working directly with clients, no account-management layer — rather than a large agency that happens to use the word 'studio'. Spaceberry Studio's primary differentiator is: one of the most accessible entry points in this list via a subscription model rather than a large upfront fixed-price contract. They also differ in team size (70+ vs 12–50), minimum engagement (Not published vs $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech vs SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products).
Verify all details directly with each studio before making a decision.