Postlight vs Gapsy Studio: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Gapsy Studio (4.5/5) edges ahead of Postlight (3.8/5) overall. Gapsy Studio is the better choice for Fintech, SaaS, healthcare — perfect-rated boutique. Postlight is the stronger option for Media, publishing, finance — now NTT DATA-backed. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Postlight vs Gapsy Studio: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Postlight | Gapsy Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2015 | 2014 |
| HQ | New York, NY, USA | Dnipro, Ukraine |
| Team size | 130+ (at last independently reported size) | Collective model, size not published (500+ completed projects) |
| Rating | 3.8 / 5 | 4.5 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | A publishing- and finance-heavy client list (Reuters, Bloomberg, Goldman Sachs) built as an independent studio, now backed by NTT DATA's global engineering scale | A perfect 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 reviews, backed by 13+ international awards, from a studio that doesn't publish its own headcount |
| Pricing model | Project-based (not published) | Fixed project, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | Not published | $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, React, Node.js | Figma, Webflow, After Effects |
| Industries served | Media & entertainment, Financial services / fintech, Enterprise transformation | Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software, Healthcare, EdTech, E-commerce / retail |
Postlight vs Gapsy Studio: overview
Postlight
Postlight started in New York in 2015 as a product design and engineering studio, building client relationships with Reuters, Barnes & Noble, Bloomberg, Goldman Sachs, and Vice. NTT DATA acquired Postlight in September 2022, folding it into NTT DATA's much larger digital transformation and engineering practice — worth disclosing since the studio is no longer independently owned. At its last independently reported size, the team ran 130+ people spanning product design, architecture, and development.
Gapsy Studio
Gapsy Studio describes its own history as running "since 2014" — treated here as self-reported since it isn't independently confirmed — from Dnipro, Ukraine. Instead of a headcount, the studio calls itself a "collective of creative professionals," pointing to 500+ completed projects and a 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 reviews. Thirteen-plus international awards from Behance, Awwwards, FWA, CSS Winner, Titan Awards, and DesignRush back that rating, spanning fintech, SaaS, health, education, and retail work.
Services and capabilities: Postlight vs Gapsy Studio
| Capability | Postlight | Gapsy Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✓ | ✗ |
| Branding | ✗ | ✓ |
| Web development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Design systems | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Postlight vs Gapsy Studio
| Framework / platform | Postlight | Gapsy Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | N/A | ✓ |
| React | ✓ | ✓ |
| Framer | N/A | N/A |
| Adobe Creative Suite | N/A | N/A |
| Design systems/Storybook | N/A | N/A |
| After Effects | N/A | ✓ |
Pricing comparison: Postlight vs Gapsy Studio
| Criterion | Postlight | Gapsy Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Dedicated team | Fixed project, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: Postlight vs Gapsy Studio
| Dimension | Postlight | Gapsy Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Media & entertainment, Financial services / fintech, Enterprise transformation | Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software, Healthcare |
| Best use cases | Media or publishing product design and engineering, Financial-services product design backed by a larger technology partner | Fintech app UI/UX with brand identity work, Healthcare or EdTech product redesign |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Postlight vs Gapsy Studio: pros and cons
| Postlight | |
|---|---|
| + | Named client relationships with Reuters, Bloomberg, Goldman Sachs, Barnes & Noble, and Vice |
| + | 130+ person team (at last independently reported size) covers product design, architecture, and development |
| + | NTT DATA acquisition since September 2022 provides access to a much larger global engineering organization |
| + | A decade of continuous operation since its 2015 founding |
| - | Acquired by NTT DATA in 2022 — no longer an independently owned studio |
| - | Team size figures predate the acquisition; current standalone headcount isn't published |
| - | Pricing and minimum engagement size aren't published |
| Gapsy Studio | |
|---|---|
| + | 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 public reviews — one of the highest verified scores in this list |
| + | 13+ international design awards across Behance, Awwwards, FWA, CSS Winner, Titan Awards, and DesignRush |
| + | 500+ completed projects demonstrates a substantial delivery track record |
| + | Covers five distinct industries (fintech, SaaS, health, education, retail) from one team |
| - | Doesn't publish a specific headcount, describing itself as a 'collective' — harder to gauge delivery capacity |
| - | Founding year is self-reported ('since 2014') rather than independently confirmed |
| - | Its broad five-industry positioning trades off some depth against single-vertical specialists like UXDA |
Who should choose Postlight?
A typical fit: media or publishing product design and engineering.
A publishing- and finance-heavy client list (Reuters, Bloomberg, Goldman Sachs) built as an independent studio, now backed by NTT DATA's global engineering scale. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Media & entertainment, Financial services / fintech, Enterprise transformation.
Who should choose Gapsy Studio?
A typical fit: fintech app UI/UX with brand identity work.
A perfect 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 reviews, backed by 13+ international awards, from a studio that doesn't publish its own headcount. Minimum engagement starts at $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software, Healthcare, EdTech, E-commerce / retail.
Decision matrix: Postlight vs Gapsy Studio
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Postlight |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Postlight |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Postlight (Not published) vs Gapsy Studio ($10K (per company website; independently unverifiable)) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Gapsy Studio |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Postlight vs Gapsy Studio
| Use case | Postlight fit | Gapsy Studio fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Media or publishing product design and engineering | Strong | Limited | Postlight |
| Financial-services product design backed by a larger technology partner | Strong | Limited | Postlight |
| Fintech app UI/UX with brand identity work | Limited | Strong | Gapsy Studio |
| Healthcare or EdTech product redesign | Limited | Strong | Gapsy Studio |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Postlight vs Gapsy Studio
Gapsy Studio (4.5/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. A perfect 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 reviews, backed by 13+ international awards, from a studio that doesn't publish its own headcount.
Postlight (3.8/5) is worth a look if you need financial-services product design backed by a larger technology partner. If your situation matches that, Postlight is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Postlight vs Gapsy Studio FAQ
Is Postlight better than Gapsy Studio?
Gapsy Studio (4.5/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Postlight's strongest advantage: named client relationships with Reuters, Bloomberg, Goldman Sachs, Barnes & Noble, and Vice. Gapsy Studio's strongest advantage: 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 public reviews — one of the highest verified scores in this list.
How do Postlight and Gapsy Studio differ in pricing?
Postlight uses project-based (not published) pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Gapsy Studio uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Postlight or Gapsy Studio?
Gapsy Studio is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each studio before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Postlight and Gapsy Studio?
Postlight's primary differentiator is: a publishing- and finance-heavy client list (Reuters, Bloomberg, Goldman Sachs) built as an independent studio, now backed by NTT DATA's global engineering scale. Gapsy Studio's primary differentiator is: a perfect 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 reviews, backed by 13+ international awards, from a studio that doesn't publish its own headcount. They also differ in team size (130+ (at last independently reported size) vs Collective model, size not published (500+ completed projects)), minimum engagement (Not published vs $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (Media & entertainment, Financial services / fintech vs Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software).
Verify all details directly with each studio before making a decision.