Best Product Design Studios

Qubstudio vs ANML: full comparison for 2026

Quick verdict

Qubstudio (4.5/5) edges ahead of ANML (3.8/5) overall. Qubstudio is the better choice for fintech, logistics, and healthcare companies needing anything from a new MVP to an enterprise redesign.. ANML is the stronger option for b2B, healthcare, and AI startups wanting a very small, senior team rather than a larger studio.. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.

Qubstudio vs ANML: head-to-head summary

Criterion Qubstudio ANML
Founded 2006 2012
HQ London, UK (Canary Wharf), Ukraine-based delivery team United States (specific city not published)
Team size 51–200 (company states ~70 creative professionals) ~10 (per LinkedIn)
Rating 4.5 / 5 3.8 / 5
Best for Fintech, logistics, and healthcare companies needing anything from a new MVP to an enterprise redesign. B2B, healthcare, and AI startups wanting a very small, senior team rather than a larger studio.
Pricing model Fixed project, dedicated team Fixed project
Min. engagement $15K (per company website; independently unverifiable) Not published
Primary tech stack Figma, Sketch, Webflow Figma, Sketch
Industries served Financial services / fintech, Healthcare Healthcare, SaaS / B2B software

Qubstudio vs ANML: overview

Qubstudio

Qubstudio traces to around 2006 (some sources say 2007), headquartered in London's Canary Wharf with a Ukraine-based delivery team, describing roughly 70 creative professionals within a broader 51–200 employee band. Clutch's 2026 rankings place it #1 among UX/UI studios with 90+ reviews, and Red Dot Design Award and UX Design Awards recognition back that up. Work spans fintech, logistics, healthcare, and EdTech, from new MVPs through enterprise-scale redesigns.

ANML

ANML (Animal) has operated since 2012, though its HQ isn't explicitly published in available sources, so it's treated here as a US-based boutique without stating a specific city. Team size is genuinely small — one source cites 10 employees on LinkedIn — positioning it as a boutique UI/UX design shop concentrated on B2B, healthcare, and AI clients.

Services and capabilities: Qubstudio vs ANML

Capability Qubstudio ANML
Product design
UX research
Branding
Web development
Mobile development
Design systems

Tech stack comparison: Qubstudio vs ANML

Framework / platform Qubstudio ANML
Figma
Webflow N/A
React N/A
Framer N/A N/A
Adobe Creative Suite N/A N/A
Design systems/Storybook N/A N/A
After Effects N/A N/A

Pricing comparison: Qubstudio vs ANML

Criterion Qubstudio ANML
Minimum engagement $15K (per company website; independently unverifiable) Not published
Engagement models Fixed project, Dedicated team Fixed project
Rate transparency Minimum disclosed Minimum disclosed
Price tier Accessible Mid-market

Target audience comparison: Qubstudio vs ANML

Dimension Qubstudio ANML
Best company size Startup to mid-market Startup to mid-market
Best industries Financial services / fintech, Healthcare Healthcare, SaaS / B2B software
Best use cases Fintech MVP launch design, Logistics platform UX overhaul B2B SaaS product design for a small, senior team, Healthcare product UX with a boutique studio
Typical project type Fixed project Fixed project

Qubstudio vs ANML: pros and cons

Qubstudio
+ #1 UX/UI studio on Clutch's 2026 rankings across 90+ public reviews
+ Independently verified via Red Dot Design Award and UX Design Awards recognition
+ Nearly two decades of operation with a stable London HQ and Ukraine delivery team
+ Covers everything from MVP launches to enterprise digital transformation
- Founding year is disputed between sources (2006 vs. 2007) — treated as approximate
- Ukraine-based delivery team carries the same regional-continuity considerations as other Ukraine-rooted studios
- The 51–200 directory band is wide; the company's own ~70 figure is more precise but self-reported
ANML
+ 13 years of continuous operation since 2012
+ Very small (~10 person) team means direct access to senior designers on every project
+ Focused specifically on B2B, healthcare, and AI rather than spreading across unrelated verticals
+ Boutique scale keeps overhead — and likely pricing — lower than mid-size studios
- HQ city is not explicitly published in available sources, making delivery-location verification harder
- A ~10-person team caps capacity for large or multi-workstream programs
- Minimum engagement is not published, so budget planning requires a direct conversation

Who should choose Qubstudio?

Qubstudio is the right choice for fintech, logistics, and healthcare companies needing anything from a new MVP to an enterprise redesign..

#1 UX/UI studio on Clutch's 2026 rankings across 90+ reviews, with Red Dot Design Award recognition on top. Minimum engagement starts at $15K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in Financial services / fintech, Healthcare.

Who should choose ANML?

ANML is the right choice for b2B, healthcare, and AI startups wanting a very small, senior team rather than a larger studio..

One of the smallest teams in this list, offering the highest senior-to-client ratio for B2B, healthcare, and AI work. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Healthcare, SaaS / B2B software.

Decision matrix: Qubstudio vs ANML

Your situation Recommended choice
You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope Qubstudio
You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme Qubstudio
Your budget is at the lower end Compare: Qubstudio ($15K (per company website; independently unverifiable)) vs ANML (Not published)
You need specialist depth in a specific vertical Qubstudio
You need staff augmentation or team extension Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug
You need consulting before committing to a build Both may offer discovery engagements

Use case fit: Qubstudio vs ANML

Use case Qubstudio fit ANML fit Winner
Fintech MVP launch design Strong Limited Qubstudio
Logistics platform UX overhaul Strong Limited Qubstudio
B2B SaaS product design for a small, senior team Limited Strong ANML
Healthcare product UX with a boutique studio Strong Strong Both equally
Fixed-price product build Limited Limited Both equally
Dedicated design team augmentation Limited Limited Both equally

Verdict: Qubstudio vs ANML

Qubstudio (4.5/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. #1 UX/UI studio on Clutch's 2026 rankings across 90+ reviews, with Red Dot Design Award recognition on top. It is best for fintech, logistics, and healthcare companies needing anything from a new MVP to an enterprise redesign..

ANML (3.8/5) is the better choice when b2B, healthcare, and AI startups wanting a very small, senior team rather than a larger studio.. If your situation matches those criteria, ANML is a competitive option.

Related comparisons

Qubstudio vs ANML FAQ

Is Qubstudio better than ANML?

Qubstudio (4.5/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Qubstudio is better for fintech, logistics, and healthcare companies needing anything from a new MVP to an enterprise redesign.. ANML is better for b2B, healthcare, and AI startups wanting a very small, senior team rather than a larger studio..

How do Qubstudio and ANML differ in pricing?

Qubstudio uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $15K (per company website; independently unverifiable). ANML uses fixed project pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.

Which is better for enterprise: Qubstudio or ANML?

Qubstudio is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each studio before shortlisting.

What are the main differences between Qubstudio and ANML?

Qubstudio's primary differentiator is: #1 ux/ui studio on clutch's 2026 rankings across 90+ reviews, with red dot design award recognition on top. ANML's primary differentiator is: one of the smallest teams in this list, offering the highest senior-to-client ratio for b2b, healthcare, and ai work. They also differ in team size (51–200 (company states ~70 creative professionals) vs ~10 (per LinkedIn)), minimum engagement ($15K (per company website; independently unverifiable) vs Not published), and primary industries served (Financial services / fintech, Healthcare vs Healthcare, SaaS / B2B software).

Verify all details directly with each studio before making a decision.