Best Product Design Studios

ustwo vs Eleken: full comparison for 2026

Quick verdict

ustwo (4.1/5) edges ahead of Eleken (4.1/5) overall. ustwo is the better choice for Enterprise/consumer teams, two decades of product craft. Eleken is the stronger option for SaaS teams, subscription-based embedded designer. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.

ustwo vs Eleken: head-to-head summary

Criterion ustwo Eleken
Founded 2004 2015
HQ London, UK Distributed team, roots in Kyiv, Ukraine
Team size ~260 40+ to 100+ (approximate; reported figures vary by source)
Rating 4.1 / 5 4.1 / 5
Primary differentiator One of the few studios on this list that ships both enterprise client work and its own award-winning consumer product, Monument Valley A SaaS-only subscription embedded-designer model (~$6,599/month) with a 4.9 Clutch rating across 200+ projects
Pricing model Fixed project, dedicated team Subscription (dedicated full-time or part-time designer)
Min. engagement Not published $6,599/month (per company website; independently unverifiable)
Primary tech stack Figma, Sketch, Swift Figma, Design systems/Storybook, Miro
Industries served Consumer products, Enterprise transformation SaaS / B2B software

ustwo vs Eleken: overview

ustwo

Matt Miller and John Sinclair opened ustwo's doors in Shoreditch, London in November 2004; the studio now spans London, New York, Malmö, Tokyo, and Lisbon with around 260 employees (as of 2022). Early enterprise clients Sony Ericsson and JPMorgan sit alongside a rarer credential: ustwo's own award-winning game, Monument Valley, which demonstrates genuine consumer product craft through self-published IP rather than client work alone.

Eleken

Eleken traces to 2015 with roots in Kyiv, Ukraine, operating today as a distributed team reported anywhere from 40+ to 100+ designers depending on source. Rather than a fixed project fee, the studio sells a subscription — roughly $6,599/month for a dedicated full-time designer, part-time also available — a genuinely different pricing model from the fixed-price and T&M norm found elsewhere in this list. SaaS-only by design, Eleken holds a 4.9 Clutch rating across 200+ projects, covering complex B2B, AI, data, and geospatial or low-code/no-code products.

Services and capabilities: ustwo vs Eleken

Capability ustwo Eleken
Product design
UX research
Branding
Web development
Mobile development
Design systems

Tech stack comparison: ustwo vs Eleken

Framework / platform ustwo Eleken
Figma
Webflow N/A N/A
React N/A N/A
Framer N/A N/A
Adobe Creative Suite N/A
Design systems/Storybook N/A
After Effects N/A N/A

Pricing comparison: ustwo vs Eleken

Criterion ustwo Eleken
Minimum engagement Not published $6,599/month (per company website; independently unverifiable)
Engagement models Fixed project, Dedicated team Subscription
Rate transparency Minimum disclosed Minimum disclosed
Price tier Mid-market Accessible

Target audience comparison: ustwo vs Eleken

Dimension ustwo Eleken
Best company size Startup to mid-market Startup to mid-market
Best industries Consumer products, Enterprise transformation SaaS / B2B software
Best use cases Enterprise financial services app design, Consumer mobile product design and development Embedded product designer for an ongoing SaaS roadmap, Complex B2B or AI product design on a monthly subscription
Typical project type Fixed project Subscription

ustwo vs Eleken: pros and cons

ustwo
+ Independently owned and operating continuously since 2004
+ Studio presence across five cities — London, New York, Malmö, Tokyo, Lisbon
+ Built and shipped its own consumer product (Monument Valley), evidence of design craft beyond client work
+ 260-person team is large enough for multi-stream engagements while staying boutique in culture
- The 260-person figure is from 2022; no more recent public headcount is available
- General digital product studio positioning means less vertical specialization than fintech- or healthcare-only boutiques
- Minimum engagement isn't published, making early budget planning harder
Eleken
+ 4.9 Clutch rating across 200+ completed projects and 70+ published case studies
+ Subscription pricing gives predictable monthly cost instead of a large fixed-price contract
+ SaaS-only focus, including complex B2B, AI, data, and geospatial products, builds real vertical depth
+ Part-time subscription option available for teams that don't need a full-time designer
- Reported team size varies widely by source (40+ to 100+), making capacity planning imprecise
- SaaS-only positioning rules it out for consumer, healthcare, or brand-led engagements
- Subscription pricing can cost more than a fixed-price project for a short, well-defined engagement

Who should choose ustwo?

A typical fit: enterprise financial services app design.

One of the few studios on this list that ships both enterprise client work and its own award-winning consumer product, Monument Valley. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Consumer products, Enterprise transformation.

Who should choose Eleken?

A typical fit: embedded product designer for an ongoing SaaS roadmap.

A SaaS-only subscription embedded-designer model (~$6,599/month) with a 4.9 Clutch rating across 200+ projects. Minimum engagement starts at $6,599/month (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software.

Decision matrix: ustwo vs Eleken

Your situation Recommended choice
You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope ustwo
You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme ustwo
Your budget is at the lower end Compare: ustwo (Not published) vs Eleken ($6,599/month (per company website; independently unverifiable))
You need specialist depth in a specific vertical ustwo
You need staff augmentation or team extension Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug
You need consulting before committing to a build Both may offer discovery engagements

Use case fit: ustwo vs Eleken

Use case ustwo fit Eleken fit Winner
Enterprise financial services app design Strong Limited ustwo
Consumer mobile product design and development Strong Limited ustwo
Embedded product designer for an ongoing SaaS roadmap Limited Strong Eleken
Complex B2B or AI product design on a monthly subscription Limited Strong Eleken
Fixed-price product build Limited Limited Both equally
Dedicated design team augmentation Limited Limited Both equally

Verdict: ustwo vs Eleken

ustwo (4.1/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. One of the few studios on this list that ships both enterprise client work and its own award-winning consumer product, Monument Valley.

Eleken (4.1/5) is worth a look if you need complex B2B or AI product design on a monthly subscription. If your situation matches that, Eleken is a competitive option.

Related comparisons

ustwo vs Eleken FAQ

Is ustwo better than Eleken?

ustwo (4.1/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. ustwo's strongest advantage: independently owned and operating continuously since 2004. Eleken's strongest advantage: 4.9 Clutch rating across 200+ completed projects and 70+ published case studies.

How do ustwo and Eleken differ in pricing?

ustwo uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Eleken uses subscription (dedicated full-time or part-time designer) pricing with a minimum engagement of $6,599/month (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.

Which is better for enterprise: ustwo or Eleken?

Eleken is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each studio before shortlisting.

What are the main differences between ustwo and Eleken?

ustwo's primary differentiator is: one of the few studios on this list that ships both enterprise client work and its own award-winning consumer product, Monument Valley. Eleken's primary differentiator is: a SaaS-only subscription embedded-designer model (~$6,599/month) with a 4.9 Clutch rating across 200+ projects. They also differ in team size (~260 vs 40+ to 100+ (approximate; reported figures vary by source)), minimum engagement (Not published vs $6,599/month (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (Consumer products, Enterprise transformation vs SaaS / B2B software).

Verify all details directly with each studio before making a decision.