Work & Co vs Orbix Studio: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Work & Co (3.9/5) edges ahead of Orbix Studio (3.6/5) overall. Work & Co is the better choice for premium consumer and enterprise brands wanting design paired tightly with production-grade front-end engineering.. Orbix Studio is the stronger option for seed-to-Series-B B2B SaaS, fintech, and healthtech startups wanting a young, founder-close team.. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Work & Co vs Orbix Studio: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Work & Co | Orbix Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2013 | 2023 |
| HQ | Dumbo, Brooklyn, NY, USA | Queens, NY, USA |
| Team size | 425+ | 10–30 |
| Rating | 3.9 / 5 | 3.6 / 5 |
| Best for | Premium consumer and enterprise brands wanting design paired tightly with production-grade front-end engineering. | Seed-to-Series-B B2B SaaS, fintech, and healthtech startups wanting a young, founder-close team. |
| Pricing model | Fixed project, dedicated team | Fixed project |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, React, Next.js | Figma, React, Swift |
| Industries served | Consumer products, Enterprise transformation, Healthcare | SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech, Healthcare |
Work & Co vs Orbix Studio: overview
Work & Co
Five co-founders — Gene Liebel, Felipe Memoria, Joe Stewart, Mohan Ramaswamy, and Marcelo Eduardo — launched Work & Co in Dumbo, Brooklyn in May 2013; the studio now spans offices across the US, Latin America, and Europe. A client roster including Apple, IKEA, Google, Mercedes-Benz, Pfizer, GoFundMe, Nike, and Disney is exceptional for a 425-person studio, reflecting an engineering-heavy model where design and front-end build happen inside the same team. Work & Co is now part of Accenture Song, an ownership detail worth disclosing.
Orbix Studio
Orbix Studio launched in 2023, making it notably the youngest studio in this entire list — a useful 'emerging' contrast point, but one with a genuinely limited track record relative to studios with a decade or more of history. Based in Queens, NY, the studio reports 10–30 employees depending on source, focused on B2B SaaS, fintech, and healthtech product design paired with front-end development, aimed specifically at funded startups from seed through Series B.
Services and capabilities: Work & Co vs Orbix Studio
| Capability | Work & Co | Orbix Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✗ | ✓ |
| Branding | ✗ | ✗ |
| Web development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Design systems | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Work & Co vs Orbix Studio
| Framework / platform | Work & Co | Orbix Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | N/A | N/A |
| React | ✓ | ✓ |
| Framer | N/A | N/A |
| Adobe Creative Suite | N/A | N/A |
| Design systems/Storybook | N/A | N/A |
| After Effects | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Work & Co vs Orbix Studio
| Criterion | Work & Co | Orbix Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Dedicated team | Fixed project |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Work & Co vs Orbix Studio
| Dimension | Work & Co | Orbix Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Consumer products, Enterprise transformation, Healthcare | SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech, Healthcare |
| Best use cases | Flagship consumer app redesign for a global brand, E-commerce platform rebuild with heavy front-end engineering | Seed-stage B2B SaaS MVP design and front-end build, Fintech product design for a Series A-B startup |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Work & Co vs Orbix Studio: pros and cons
| Work & Co | |
|---|---|
| + | Client roster (Apple, IKEA, Google, Nike, Disney) is exceptional relative to headcount |
| + | Design and engineering under one roof cuts the hand-off risk of splitting vendors |
| + | 425+ people across the US, Europe, and Latin America give real multi-region capacity |
| + | Consistent record shipping flagship consumer digital products |
| - | Now part of Accenture Song, which shares a parent with the Accenture Song entry elsewhere in this list |
| - | A premium client base implies premium pricing even without a published minimum |
| - | Less vertical specialization (fintech, healthcare-specific) than boutiques built around one niche |
| Orbix Studio | |
|---|---|
| + | Built specifically for funded startups at the seed-through-Series-B stage, a precise positioning few others in this list share |
| + | Small team size (10–30) means direct founder-to-founder access rather than layered account management |
| + | Combines product design with front-end development, reducing hand-off risk for early-stage teams |
| + | Covers three complex, high-value verticals (B2B SaaS, fintech, healthtech) despite its youth |
| - | Founded in 2023 — by a wide margin the thinnest public track record of any studio in this list |
| - | 10–30 person team caps capacity for large or multi-workstream programs |
| - | Minimum engagement is not published, so budget planning requires a direct conversation |
Who should choose Work & Co?
Work & Co is the right choice for premium consumer and enterprise brands wanting design paired tightly with production-grade front-end engineering..
An engineering-led delivery model behind a client roster (Apple, IKEA, Nike, Disney) unusually strong for its headcount. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Consumer products, Enterprise transformation, Healthcare.
Who should choose Orbix Studio?
Orbix Studio is the right choice for seed-to-Series-B B2B SaaS, fintech, and healthtech startups wanting a young, founder-close team..
The newest studio in this list, built specifically around the seed-to-Series-B funded startup stage. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech, Healthcare.
Decision matrix: Work & Co vs Orbix Studio
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Work & Co |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Work & Co |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Work & Co (Not published) vs Orbix Studio (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Work & Co |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Work & Co vs Orbix Studio
| Use case | Work & Co fit | Orbix Studio fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flagship consumer app redesign for a global brand | Strong | Limited | Work & Co |
| E-commerce platform rebuild with heavy front-end engineering | Strong | Limited | Work & Co |
| Seed-stage B2B SaaS MVP design and front-end build | Limited | Strong | Orbix Studio |
| Fintech product design for a Series A-B startup | Limited | Strong | Orbix Studio |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Work & Co vs Orbix Studio
Work & Co (3.9/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. An engineering-led delivery model behind a client roster (Apple, IKEA, Nike, Disney) unusually strong for its headcount. It is best for premium consumer and enterprise brands wanting design paired tightly with production-grade front-end engineering..
Orbix Studio (3.6/5) is the better choice when seed-to-Series-B B2B SaaS, fintech, and healthtech startups wanting a young, founder-close team.. If your situation matches those criteria, Orbix Studio is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Work & Co vs Orbix Studio FAQ
Is Work & Co better than Orbix Studio?
Work & Co (3.9/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Work & Co is better for premium consumer and enterprise brands wanting design paired tightly with production-grade front-end engineering.. Orbix Studio is better for seed-to-Series-B B2B SaaS, fintech, and healthtech startups wanting a young, founder-close team..
How do Work & Co and Orbix Studio differ in pricing?
Work & Co uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Orbix Studio uses fixed project pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Work & Co or Orbix Studio?
Orbix Studio is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each studio before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Work & Co and Orbix Studio?
Work & Co's primary differentiator is: an engineering-led delivery model behind a client roster (apple, ikea, nike, disney) unusually strong for its headcount. Orbix Studio's primary differentiator is: the newest studio in this list, built specifically around the seed-to-series-b funded startup stage. They also differ in team size (425+ vs 10–30), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Consumer products, Enterprise transformation vs SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech).
Verify all details directly with each studio before making a decision.