Work & Co vs UXDA: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
UXDA (4.2/5) edges ahead of Work & Co (3.9/5) overall. UXDA is the better choice for banks and fintech companies wanting a studio exclusively focused on financial-services UX.. Work & Co is the stronger option for premium consumer and enterprise brands wanting design paired tightly with production-grade front-end engineering.. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Work & Co vs UXDA: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Work & Co | UXDA |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2013 | 2015 |
| HQ | Dumbo, Brooklyn, NY, USA | Riga, Latvia |
| Team size | 425+ | 25+ |
| Rating | 3.9 / 5 | 4.2 / 5 |
| Best for | Premium consumer and enterprise brands wanting design paired tightly with production-grade front-end engineering. | Banks and fintech companies wanting a studio exclusively focused on financial-services UX. |
| Pricing model | Fixed project, dedicated team | Fixed project, retainer |
| Min. engagement | Not published | $30K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, React, Next.js | Figma, Sketch, Design systems/Storybook |
| Industries served | Consumer products, Enterprise transformation, Healthcare | Financial services / fintech |
Work & Co vs UXDA: overview
Work & Co
Five co-founders — Gene Liebel, Felipe Memoria, Joe Stewart, Mohan Ramaswamy, and Marcelo Eduardo — launched Work & Co in Dumbo, Brooklyn in May 2013; the studio now spans offices across the US, Latin America, and Europe. A client roster including Apple, IKEA, Google, Mercedes-Benz, Pfizer, GoFundMe, Nike, and Disney is exceptional for a 425-person studio, reflecting an engineering-heavy model where design and front-end build happen inside the same team. Work & Co is now part of Accenture Song, an ownership detail worth disclosing.
UXDA
Alex Kreger and co-founder Linda launched UXDA (Financial UX Design) in 2015 out of Riga, Latvia, where a 25+ multidisciplinary team has since defined or governed 150+ banking and fintech digital platforms across 39 countries. That exclusively financial-services focus makes it the clearest fintech specialist in this list — no other studio here works exclusively in one vertical.
Services and capabilities: Work & Co vs UXDA
| Capability | Work & Co | UXDA |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✗ | ✓ |
| Branding | ✗ | ✓ |
| Web development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Mobile development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Design systems | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Work & Co vs UXDA
| Framework / platform | Work & Co | UXDA |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | N/A | N/A |
| React | ✓ | N/A |
| Framer | N/A | N/A |
| Adobe Creative Suite | N/A | N/A |
| Design systems/Storybook | N/A | ✓ |
| After Effects | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Work & Co vs UXDA
| Criterion | Work & Co | UXDA |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | $30K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Dedicated team | Fixed project, Retainer |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: Work & Co vs UXDA
| Dimension | Work & Co | UXDA |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Consumer products, Enterprise transformation, Healthcare | Financial services / fintech |
| Best use cases | Flagship consumer app redesign for a global brand, E-commerce platform rebuild with heavy front-end engineering | Bank digital platform redesign, Fintech app UX for a regulated market |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Work & Co vs UXDA: pros and cons
| Work & Co | |
|---|---|
| + | Client roster (Apple, IKEA, Google, Nike, Disney) is exceptional relative to headcount |
| + | Design and engineering under one roof cuts the hand-off risk of splitting vendors |
| + | 425+ people across the US, Europe, and Latin America give real multi-region capacity |
| + | Consistent record shipping flagship consumer digital products |
| - | Now part of Accenture Song, which shares a parent with the Accenture Song entry elsewhere in this list |
| - | A premium client base implies premium pricing even without a published minimum |
| - | Less vertical specialization (fintech, healthcare-specific) than boutiques built around one niche |
| UXDA | |
|---|---|
| + | Exclusive financial-services focus gives it domain expertise generalist studios simply can't match |
| + | 150+ banking and fintech platforms shaped across 39 countries over a decade |
| + | Small, senior 25+ team keeps client relationships direct rather than layered through account management |
| + | A decade of continuous, single-vertical operation compounds domain knowledge over time |
| - | The exclusive fintech focus is a real limitation for any client outside financial services |
| - | $30K minimum engagement (per company website; independently unverifiable) runs higher than most 25-person boutiques |
| - | Small team size (25+) caps capacity for very large, multi-workstream programs |
Who should choose Work & Co?
Work & Co is the right choice for premium consumer and enterprise brands wanting design paired tightly with production-grade front-end engineering..
An engineering-led delivery model behind a client roster (Apple, IKEA, Nike, Disney) unusually strong for its headcount. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Consumer products, Enterprise transformation, Healthcare.
Who should choose UXDA?
UXDA is the right choice for banks and fintech companies wanting a studio exclusively focused on financial-services UX..
The only studio in this list exclusively focused on financial services UX, with 150+ banking and fintech platforms shaped across 39 countries. Minimum engagement starts at $30K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in Financial services / fintech.
Decision matrix: Work & Co vs UXDA
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Work & Co |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Work & Co |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Work & Co (Not published) vs UXDA ($30K (per company website; independently unverifiable)) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Work & Co |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Work & Co vs UXDA
| Use case | Work & Co fit | UXDA fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flagship consumer app redesign for a global brand | Strong | Limited | Work & Co |
| E-commerce platform rebuild with heavy front-end engineering | Strong | Limited | Work & Co |
| Bank digital platform redesign | Limited | Strong | UXDA |
| Fintech app UX for a regulated market | Limited | Strong | UXDA |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Work & Co vs UXDA
UXDA (4.2/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. The only studio in this list exclusively focused on financial services UX, with 150+ banking and fintech platforms shaped across 39 countries. It is best for banks and fintech companies wanting a studio exclusively focused on financial-services UX..
Work & Co (3.9/5) is the better choice when premium consumer and enterprise brands wanting design paired tightly with production-grade front-end engineering.. If your situation matches those criteria, Work & Co is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Work & Co vs UXDA FAQ
Is Work & Co better than UXDA?
UXDA (4.2/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Work & Co is better for premium consumer and enterprise brands wanting design paired tightly with production-grade front-end engineering.. UXDA is better for banks and fintech companies wanting a studio exclusively focused on financial-services UX..
How do Work & Co and UXDA differ in pricing?
Work & Co uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. UXDA uses fixed project, retainer pricing with a minimum engagement of $30K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Work & Co or UXDA?
Work & Co is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each studio before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Work & Co and UXDA?
Work & Co's primary differentiator is: an engineering-led delivery model behind a client roster (apple, ikea, nike, disney) unusually strong for its headcount. UXDA's primary differentiator is: the only studio in this list exclusively focused on financial services ux, with 150+ banking and fintech platforms shaped across 39 countries. They also differ in team size (425+ vs 25+), minimum engagement (Not published vs $30K (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (Consumer products, Enterprise transformation vs Financial services / fintech).
Verify all details directly with each studio before making a decision.