UX studio vs Spaceberry Studio: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
UX studio (4.3/5) edges ahead of Spaceberry Studio (3.7/5) overall. UX studio is the better choice for b2B SaaS teams with complex products wanting research completed before any UI work begins.. Spaceberry Studio is the stronger option for budget-conscious SaaS, AI, and mobile app teams wanting a lower-commitment monthly subscription instead of a large fixed-price contract.. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
UX studio vs Spaceberry Studio: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | UX studio | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2013 | 2016 |
| HQ | Budapest, Hungary | Ukraine (also London, UK) |
| Team size | 60–71 | 12–50 |
| Rating | 4.3 / 5 | 3.7 / 5 |
| Best for | B2B SaaS teams with complex products wanting research completed before any UI work begins. | Budget-conscious SaaS, AI, and mobile app teams wanting a lower-commitment monthly subscription instead of a large fixed-price contract. |
| Pricing model | Fixed project, dedicated team | Monthly subscription (dedicated designer) |
| Min. engagement | $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable) | $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, Dovetail, Maze | Figma, Framer, Webflow |
| Industries served | SaaS / B2B software | SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products |
UX studio vs Spaceberry Studio: overview
UX studio
David Pasztor founded UX studio (uxstudioteam.com) in Budapest, Hungary in 2013, where it now reports 60–71 employees depending on source. The studio leads with research, focused on B2B SaaS teams simplifying complex products — a discovery-heavy methodology that offers a genuinely comparable reference point to Phenomenon Studio's own discovery-first approach.
Spaceberry Studio
Spaceberry Studio launched in 2016 as 'MainCode Agency' before rebranding to Spaceberry in 2020; 2016 is used as the founding year since it's the same continuous team and entity. Based in Ukraine with an additional London, UK location, the studio reports 12–50 employees depending on source, offering subscription-style UI/UX design for SaaS, AI, and mobile apps — one of two subscription comparators in this list alongside Eleken.
Services and capabilities: UX studio vs Spaceberry Studio
| Capability | UX studio | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✓ | ✗ |
| Branding | ✗ | ✗ |
| Web development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Mobile development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Design systems | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: UX studio vs Spaceberry Studio
| Framework / platform | UX studio | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | N/A | ✓ |
| React | N/A | N/A |
| Framer | N/A | ✓ |
| Adobe Creative Suite | N/A | N/A |
| Design systems/Storybook | N/A | N/A |
| After Effects | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: UX studio vs Spaceberry Studio
| Criterion | UX studio | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable) | $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Dedicated team | Subscription |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Accessible | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: UX studio vs Spaceberry Studio
| Dimension | UX studio | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | SaaS / B2B software | SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products |
| Best use cases | Complex B2B SaaS product research and redesign, Discovery-phase UX research before a full product build | Ongoing SaaS product design on a monthly subscription, AI product UI/UX design for a lean startup team |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Subscription |
UX studio vs Spaceberry Studio: pros and cons
| UX studio | |
|---|---|
| + | A genuine research-first specialty, evidenced by the studio's own published case studies, not just marketing copy |
| + | Over a decade of continuous operation (since 2013) under its founding team |
| + | Focused specifically on B2B SaaS, giving real depth in untangling complex product workflows |
| + | 60–71 person team is large enough for multi-workstream engagements while staying boutique in culture |
| - | Exclusive B2B SaaS focus means less fit for consumer, healthcare, or fintech-specific projects |
| - | The research-first approach can extend project timelines for clients wanting to move straight to UI |
| - | $20K minimum engagement (per company website; independently unverifiable) is mid-tier, not the cheapest option here |
| Spaceberry Studio | |
|---|---|
| + | Subscription pricing (from ~$4.5K/month, per company website; independently unverifiable) is one of the lowest barriers to entry here |
| + | Focused specifically on SaaS, AI, and mobile apps rather than spreading thin across many verticals |
| + | London, UK location adds geographic diversification alongside its Ukraine base |
| + | Continuous operation since 2016, spanning its 2020 rebrand from MainCode Agency |
| - | Smallest reported team-size band (12–50) among the boutiques in this list, limiting capacity for large programs |
| - | Rebranded from MainCode Agency in 2020, so some pre-2020 case studies may appear under the earlier name |
| - | Subscription-only model may not suit clients preferring a single fixed-price contract with a defined end date |
Who should choose UX studio?
UX studio is the right choice for b2B SaaS teams with complex products wanting research completed before any UI work begins..
A research-first methodology comparable in rigor to Phenomenon Studio's own discovery-first approach, applied specifically to complex B2B SaaS products. Minimum engagement starts at $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software.
Who should choose Spaceberry Studio?
Spaceberry Studio is the right choice for budget-conscious SaaS, AI, and mobile app teams wanting a lower-commitment monthly subscription instead of a large fixed-price contract..
One of the most accessible entry points in this list via a subscription model rather than a large upfront fixed-price contract. Minimum engagement starts at $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products.
Decision matrix: UX studio vs Spaceberry Studio
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | UX studio |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | UX studio |
| Your budget is at the lower end | UX studio |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Spaceberry Studio |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: UX studio vs Spaceberry Studio
| Use case | UX studio fit | Spaceberry Studio fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Complex B2B SaaS product research and redesign | Strong | Limited | UX studio |
| Discovery-phase UX research before a full product build | Strong | Limited | UX studio |
| Ongoing SaaS product design on a monthly subscription | Limited | Strong | Spaceberry Studio |
| AI product UI/UX design for a lean startup team | Limited | Strong | Spaceberry Studio |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: UX studio vs Spaceberry Studio
UX studio (4.3/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. A research-first methodology comparable in rigor to Phenomenon Studio's own discovery-first approach, applied specifically to complex B2B SaaS products. It is best for b2B SaaS teams with complex products wanting research completed before any UI work begins..
Spaceberry Studio (3.7/5) is the better choice when budget-conscious SaaS, AI, and mobile app teams wanting a lower-commitment monthly subscription instead of a large fixed-price contract.. If your situation matches those criteria, Spaceberry Studio is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
UX studio vs Spaceberry Studio FAQ
Is UX studio better than Spaceberry Studio?
UX studio (4.3/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. UX studio is better for b2B SaaS teams with complex products wanting research completed before any UI work begins.. Spaceberry Studio is better for budget-conscious SaaS, AI, and mobile app teams wanting a lower-commitment monthly subscription instead of a large fixed-price contract..
How do UX studio and Spaceberry Studio differ in pricing?
UX studio uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Spaceberry Studio uses monthly subscription (dedicated designer) pricing with a minimum engagement of $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: UX studio or Spaceberry Studio?
UX studio is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each studio before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between UX studio and Spaceberry Studio?
UX studio's primary differentiator is: a research-first methodology comparable in rigor to phenomenon studio's own discovery-first approach, applied specifically to complex b2b saas products. Spaceberry Studio's primary differentiator is: one of the most accessible entry points in this list via a subscription model rather than a large upfront fixed-price contract. They also differ in team size (60–71 vs 12–50), minimum engagement ($20K (per company website; independently unverifiable) vs $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (SaaS / B2B software vs SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products).
Verify all details directly with each studio before making a decision.