UXDA vs Spaceberry Studio: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
UXDA (4.2/5) edges ahead of Spaceberry Studio (3.7/5) overall. UXDA is the better choice for banks and fintech companies wanting a studio exclusively focused on financial-services UX.. Spaceberry Studio is the stronger option for budget-conscious SaaS, AI, and mobile app teams wanting a lower-commitment monthly subscription instead of a large fixed-price contract.. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
UXDA vs Spaceberry Studio: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | UXDA | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2015 | 2016 |
| HQ | Riga, Latvia | Ukraine (also London, UK) |
| Team size | 25+ | 12–50 |
| Rating | 4.2 / 5 | 3.7 / 5 |
| Best for | Banks and fintech companies wanting a studio exclusively focused on financial-services UX. | Budget-conscious SaaS, AI, and mobile app teams wanting a lower-commitment monthly subscription instead of a large fixed-price contract. |
| Pricing model | Fixed project, retainer | Monthly subscription (dedicated designer) |
| Min. engagement | $30K (per company website; independently unverifiable) | $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, Sketch, Design systems/Storybook | Figma, Framer, Webflow |
| Industries served | Financial services / fintech | SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products |
UXDA vs Spaceberry Studio: overview
UXDA
Alex Kreger and co-founder Linda launched UXDA (Financial UX Design) in 2015 out of Riga, Latvia, where a 25+ multidisciplinary team has since defined or governed 150+ banking and fintech digital platforms across 39 countries. That exclusively financial-services focus makes it the clearest fintech specialist in this list — no other studio here works exclusively in one vertical.
Spaceberry Studio
Spaceberry Studio launched in 2016 as 'MainCode Agency' before rebranding to Spaceberry in 2020; 2016 is used as the founding year since it's the same continuous team and entity. Based in Ukraine with an additional London, UK location, the studio reports 12–50 employees depending on source, offering subscription-style UI/UX design for SaaS, AI, and mobile apps — one of two subscription comparators in this list alongside Eleken.
Services and capabilities: UXDA vs Spaceberry Studio
| Capability | UXDA | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✓ | ✗ |
| Branding | ✓ | ✗ |
| Web development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Mobile development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Design systems | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: UXDA vs Spaceberry Studio
| Framework / platform | UXDA | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | N/A | ✓ |
| React | N/A | N/A |
| Framer | N/A | ✓ |
| Adobe Creative Suite | N/A | N/A |
| Design systems/Storybook | ✓ | N/A |
| After Effects | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: UXDA vs Spaceberry Studio
| Criterion | UXDA | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | $30K (per company website; independently unverifiable) | $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Retainer | Subscription |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Accessible | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: UXDA vs Spaceberry Studio
| Dimension | UXDA | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Financial services / fintech | SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products |
| Best use cases | Bank digital platform redesign, Fintech app UX for a regulated market | Ongoing SaaS product design on a monthly subscription, AI product UI/UX design for a lean startup team |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Subscription |
UXDA vs Spaceberry Studio: pros and cons
| UXDA | |
|---|---|
| + | Exclusive financial-services focus gives it domain expertise generalist studios simply can't match |
| + | 150+ banking and fintech platforms shaped across 39 countries over a decade |
| + | Small, senior 25+ team keeps client relationships direct rather than layered through account management |
| + | A decade of continuous, single-vertical operation compounds domain knowledge over time |
| - | The exclusive fintech focus is a real limitation for any client outside financial services |
| - | $30K minimum engagement (per company website; independently unverifiable) runs higher than most 25-person boutiques |
| - | Small team size (25+) caps capacity for very large, multi-workstream programs |
| Spaceberry Studio | |
|---|---|
| + | Subscription pricing (from ~$4.5K/month, per company website; independently unverifiable) is one of the lowest barriers to entry here |
| + | Focused specifically on SaaS, AI, and mobile apps rather than spreading thin across many verticals |
| + | London, UK location adds geographic diversification alongside its Ukraine base |
| + | Continuous operation since 2016, spanning its 2020 rebrand from MainCode Agency |
| - | Smallest reported team-size band (12–50) among the boutiques in this list, limiting capacity for large programs |
| - | Rebranded from MainCode Agency in 2020, so some pre-2020 case studies may appear under the earlier name |
| - | Subscription-only model may not suit clients preferring a single fixed-price contract with a defined end date |
Who should choose UXDA?
UXDA is the right choice for banks and fintech companies wanting a studio exclusively focused on financial-services UX..
The only studio in this list exclusively focused on financial services UX, with 150+ banking and fintech platforms shaped across 39 countries. Minimum engagement starts at $30K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in Financial services / fintech.
Who should choose Spaceberry Studio?
Spaceberry Studio is the right choice for budget-conscious SaaS, AI, and mobile app teams wanting a lower-commitment monthly subscription instead of a large fixed-price contract..
One of the most accessible entry points in this list via a subscription model rather than a large upfront fixed-price contract. Minimum engagement starts at $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products.
Decision matrix: UXDA vs Spaceberry Studio
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | UXDA |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Check each company's engagement model |
| Your budget is at the lower end | UXDA |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Spaceberry Studio |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: UXDA vs Spaceberry Studio
| Use case | UXDA fit | Spaceberry Studio fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bank digital platform redesign | Strong | Limited | UXDA |
| Fintech app UX for a regulated market | Strong | Limited | UXDA |
| Ongoing SaaS product design on a monthly subscription | Limited | Strong | Spaceberry Studio |
| AI product UI/UX design for a lean startup team | Limited | Strong | Spaceberry Studio |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: UXDA vs Spaceberry Studio
UXDA (4.2/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. The only studio in this list exclusively focused on financial services UX, with 150+ banking and fintech platforms shaped across 39 countries. It is best for banks and fintech companies wanting a studio exclusively focused on financial-services UX..
Spaceberry Studio (3.7/5) is the better choice when budget-conscious SaaS, AI, and mobile app teams wanting a lower-commitment monthly subscription instead of a large fixed-price contract.. If your situation matches those criteria, Spaceberry Studio is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
UXDA vs Spaceberry Studio FAQ
Is UXDA better than Spaceberry Studio?
UXDA (4.2/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. UXDA is better for banks and fintech companies wanting a studio exclusively focused on financial-services UX.. Spaceberry Studio is better for budget-conscious SaaS, AI, and mobile app teams wanting a lower-commitment monthly subscription instead of a large fixed-price contract..
How do UXDA and Spaceberry Studio differ in pricing?
UXDA uses fixed project, retainer pricing with a minimum engagement of $30K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Spaceberry Studio uses monthly subscription (dedicated designer) pricing with a minimum engagement of $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: UXDA or Spaceberry Studio?
Spaceberry Studio is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each studio before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between UXDA and Spaceberry Studio?
UXDA's primary differentiator is: the only studio in this list exclusively focused on financial services ux, with 150+ banking and fintech platforms shaped across 39 countries. Spaceberry Studio's primary differentiator is: one of the most accessible entry points in this list via a subscription model rather than a large upfront fixed-price contract. They also differ in team size (25+ vs 12–50), minimum engagement ($30K (per company website; independently unverifiable) vs $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (Financial services / fintech vs SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products).
Verify all details directly with each studio before making a decision.